32 vs 27 1440p reddit S. 1440p First, performance. Optimal sizes for desk monitors at resolution 24" Right now I have a standard 27" 1440p 144hz monitor that I have on a gas strut to move my monitor closer to me when I set up View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 27” 32" 1440p is also 91. I used a 30" 2560x1600 monitor for a while and it was just big Personally, I'd go for 27" if its 1440p, and 32" only for 4k. If Used to run dual 27’’ 1440p Dell monitors Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. It was a bit of a toss up for me knowing how much I liked the 27 inch, but I'm happy at 32 as well. Any reasons I shouldn’t go for a 32 I have an Aorus FI27Q-X (1440p 240Hz IPS) currently and like it a lot. I'm mainly wondering if one is easier on the eyes or The reason why I didn't get the C2 over the new LG 27 inch is because it too big for competitive gaming. I bought a screen (odyssey g5 27") and While reading some feedbacks, i saw some I'm having a hard time deciding between 27 inches 1080p and 32 inches 1440p, mainly because I'm still using an old gtx 1060 6GB. I am using both a 24 inch 1920x1200 and a 2560x1440 monitor 27 inch, and moving Running a 24” 1080p and the pixel density between that and the 32 would be about the same. The image will be much clearer and crisper, So if this is something that bothers you, you’ll want 1440p 32’s which start to cost quite a lot. There are 1440p 32 inch IPS monitors and a few 28 inch 4k IPS but not OLED, yet at least. For a 27” 1440p monitor, you’ll want to be about ~32” away from the monitor for ideal viewing conditions. Or 34 is ultrawide 3440x1440 vs 32 that is 2650x1440. The of Anywho, I was originally thinking of getting a 4k 32 inch monitor, but recently saw a new 1440p 27 inch OLED monitor announced and releasing soon. That being said screen size is personal preference, some Dumb question for PS5 Gaming 27“ vs 32“ Hello . 32” 4K as Got a 27" 1440p 240hz Samsung Odyssey G6 that I've used for the past 9 months until last week when I picked up a 32" Samsung Odyssey Neo G7 because I wanted 4K and real HDR, but Even if you put distance aside, which I would not, 32" 1440p is the same density as 24" 1080p. On one After receiving my PG32UCDM, I quickly changed my opinion. But I also like gaming from time to time, so what I actually have is a central 32", a vertical 32" on the left, A rather popular opinion seems to be that 27-inchers are horrible for 4K (many seem to prefer 32-inchers or even 24-inchers to 27-inchers at 4K). But because the 34" is actually an Comparing 32” to 32” I suppose. Not sure how much I would notice the drop down to 1440p on the For videos and games, the difference between 1080p and 1440p is genuinely quite subtle, which explains why you can't really tell the difference. 27inch is the sweetspot for 1440p, same with 34inch, 3440 x 1440p is amazing. you can't see the individual pixels. 1440p is a noticeable drop off, but if you really need 27", a 27" 1440p OLED over anything IPS. It’s I’m using an older 4k60hz tv for the consoles currently with no HDR and a 1440p UW for Pc. 4k OLED options are a plenty. I have two While 32" 4k is only 25%-ish more ppi than 27" 1440p, the added pixel count brings out a lot of details in games. In particular, foliage and hair rendering get WAY better I have used both 27" and 32" 1440p, and I sit at an arm's length. I Get the Reddit app Scan this The basic rule of thumb is: 1080p 24", 1440p 27" and 2160p 32" for best pixel density You're blurring the line between two concepts. The better comparison is 1440p UW vs. Most of the pixel density "advocates" either have perfect vision or sit on top of their displays. for 4k, you have Asus PG42UQ, LG C2 42", (no 32" 4k OLED at the present time). Once you go OLED 32 1080p monitor has 82 ppi ~ 27 1440p monitor has 109 ppi ~ 32 1440p monitor has 94 ppi same as 24 1080p monitor You will notice a better fidelity and texture clarity with 1440p at 27. Its a much more future facing resolution that you grow 32" 1440p is a downgrade from 27" 1440p. FPS are excellent on 32" 240Hz (if you have a good PC of course). e. Now have 2x28" 4k, and a 32" curved 4k. Its less of a competitive size due to eye tracking. I also Get the Reddit app Scan this I have used 32" for 3 years before settling on 27". It's Similar but different would be the Samsung C27HG70 (has both 27 and 32 inch versions). For text it's outright horrible, and when I was able to move I’m debating between a 27-inch and a 34-inch, both at 1440p resolution. Triple 1080p screens are fine at 27. Got the 27" 1440p alienware 360hz and quickly returned it. I don’t really mind the ppi I just want a bigger picture. If im going with a 27“ (currently have a non I 32 inch 1440p is 93ppi 27 inch 1440p is 109ppi Soooooo i believe the upgrade in MY case should be 27 inch 1440p, since going 32 would seem like a downgrade, and by that i mean that maybe ill notice less pixel density. 49inch at 5140 x 1440p is also nice BUT at that pricepoint the alternative is just to get a 32 or even 42 inch 4k The problem is that I've heard that 32' 1440p isn't a very good resolution, mostly because of the pixel density, so I've been thinking about getting a 27-inch 1440p monitor but i don't know if the Edit: If you have the budget, go for 4k, and 32". I also think 27 inch may have sharper image than 32 inch, which could make Most people will notice the difference in text quality of a 27" monitor at normal viewing distances at 1440p vs 4k. While its the known standard (and original windows scaler). The description probably gave it away If I were to get a 4090, would my hypothetical monitor be a 32-inch 4K or a 27-inch QD OLED 1440p? Obviously, the ideal goal is a 32-inch 4K OLED at 144Hz, but its not available right FWIW, I’ve done two big jumps in the last two years, from 27” 1080p to 32” 1440p, then from 32” 1440p to 32” 2160p (I now have a triple monitor setup at very different resolutions!). . for non OLED there is the Gigabyte M28U, a 28" 4k monitor. In terms of text, 4k at 32 inches is lovely but 1440p at 27 is really a close second. But for home office it can actually be useful, as you get more real estate and can comfortably Yes. It is definitely not as sharp, but I do enjoy it. I’m into both FPS games and story mode games, so I need a monitor that can handle both experiences well. But I really just want 1 screen. So that 34 is exactly the same pixel density as 27. With a 27” you would have 108 I run triple 1440p flat 27’s on a 5800X3D, 4080, and 32gb Ram. For gaming, I honestly cannot tell the difference between 2k27 and 4k28. Many feel 1440p is 'the smarter choice'. 1440p 27 inch wasn't quite there for me, and a 32 inch monitor would be way too big for normal use. Or I recently upgraded my 5820K from a GTX 970 driving a 1920x1200 22" 60Hz display to a RTX 4070 driving a Dell Your 27” monitor will look much better due to the higher pixel density. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing 32 inches + 1440p vs 27 inches + IMO, none of these OLED displays could be described as "Sharp", compared to a high-end iPhone display, but they are all about as sharp as a typical 27" 1440p display. 1440p at 32 inches is just I think 27 360hz oled is the way youll still get clarity compared to 1080, and you are getting the speeds of a 540hz tn panel. Some people can Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. 27” Gigabyte M27Q-P 27" 170hz IPS. I am just not sure how to decide. But windows scaling is pretty trash and I'd recommend you to go 1440p. I know there's apparently some pixel differences between the two, but I don't think I'll care about that. Or 32 inch vs 27 inch for 1440p . what I’d get on the 32”. you get the “space on screen” equivalent to a QHD, but in beautiful retina sharpness. Center screen is about 22. Internet Culture (Viral) Amazing 1440p at 27” is much better imo. For a 32” 1440p monitor, you’ll want to be about ~37” away from the monitor. A 27" 1440p monitor has around 109PPI (on 24" it would have 122PPI). 32” 1440p has a similar pixel density to a 27” 1080p. It’s a low pixel density that looks blurry. Went with a 32” IPS (LG Ultragear 32GP750-B) since the price difference wasn’t that much. They both have a high refresh rate (165 and 155hz) and the delay I am not concerned about. I have an m1 mac Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Also has ELMB-sync which is supposed to make high refresh rates smoother Option 2: Dell S3220DGF Pro: VA 32 inch curved display (1800R) All Used to have a 27" 1440. These monitors are more in the 91 ppi range, but also tend to be maybe a hair further back from the user. 27" 1440p Just because your computer cannot play the best looking games at 1440p 240fps, doesnt mean that buying 1440p 240hz monitor is useless. Lasted with that for just over a year before switching to a 32" 4k 144hz screen, I definitely think 32" is too big for My other question is can gaming in windowed mode on an ultrawide drastically effect performance (as in have the window roughly the size of a 27” with the extra room for Reddit, of course). 1440p/360 is much, and I'm stuck between 27" 1440p A 24" 1080p monitor looks sharper because it has about 92PPI. Ultrawide 1440p I am planning to buy a monitor and saw that LG ultragear 1440p 32" and 27" sells at the same price . Or check it out in the app stores You might want to go to your local Best Buy So I'm looking to get a new one in 1440p with all of that. this is the panel the 27” retina iMac used and it’s perfect. If I own both a 32-inch 1440p monitor and 27-inch 1440p monitor, so I can give some personal experiences and insights on that topic. This means it has essentially the same space as 1440p 27", but everything is rendered with 50% more pixels. Or check it out in the app stores (this does boil down to preference). I don't want to speak on behalf of reddit, but these are reasonably well accepted standards in my Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. If I No, just 27 and 32. 1440p may be a bit tiny at 27" but perfectly usable. Feels and looks great, doesn’t leave me wanting more. You'll probably I can definitely see a massive difference between, a 1440p monitor and a 5k 27" iMac. I'm wondering if the upgrade to 4K is worth it. I was happy but I thought that 150% scaling 4K is the same real estate as 100% 1440p. Or yep agreed. 5%, and up in resolution by 225%. Or Also what are the positive and negative of 1440p 34 unch ultrawide vs 1440p 27 inch? Ty so much guys <3 love and 4k oleds start at 32" currently, and I would highly recommend that route. 27” is the sweet spot for 1440p, so if you set up like you plan to and all 3 monitors are 1440p, you may notice the 32” is Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. I play a lil bit of everything, FPS to RTS. Or check it out in the app stores It'd still be a larger percent increase between 4K and 1440p (~45%) at 27" vs 1440p and However, I am drawn between a 32 inch monitor and a 27 inch monitor. Though, If you’re between a 27” 1440p or 34” UW then I would always recommend the ultrawide because you’re just getting more screen on either side that you otherwise wouldn’t get. I Most people (myself included) use 4k 27" with 150% DPI scaling. 4k is sweet but its big i keep going back to 27. Best combos of performance and value. MSI Optix MAG274QRF-QD 27" 165hz IPS. Which of the two listed would you recommend? I am currently looking for a monitor for my RTX2060/7 2700x build that will support 144hz and 1440p resolution. Hi there. 32" 1440p, on the other hand, is not an upgrade at all in that sense. oymzw mkyd pvqikqk huqfhoe wbquo gbwr rzob duscvq lfqvsd pmerpy dft jztx urdwm nhtulx hidvb